From Szasz to Foucault: On the Role of Critical Psychiatry

In this article we examine the different ways in which Thomas Szasz and Michel Foucault have challenged dominant perspectives within psychiatry.

We identify, analyse and compare the central elements of their respective discourses on psychiatry and show that while they are often bracketed together, in fact there are certain fundamental differences between Szasz and Foucault. Of most importance is their contrasting ways of characterising the nature and role of critical thought. While Szasz’s analysis is predicated on a number of binary distinctions, Foucault works to overcome such distinctions. In the past ten years, a new movement of critical psychiatry has emerged. While this shares certain concerns with the critical psychiatry of the 1960s and 70s, there are substantial differences. We argue that this discourse is more resonant with the Foucauldian approach.

Philosophy, Psychiatry and Psychology

:17, 3, 219-228